No. This is central to our risk-based approach. The accuracy objective for PMCF translation and PMS documentation translation does not change with device class, document length or workflow choice. Lower-risk workflows apply leaner review steps to content where translation risk is lower, such as some supporting or administrative sections, while still aiming for accurate, complete, source-faithful translation. Higher-risk workflows add independent revision under ISO 17100 and other controls to reduce the probability and consequences of translation error in PMCF reports, PMS conclusions, PSURs, vigilance wording and notified-body-facing post-market content. Accuracy stays the constant objective.